+8801729389317

24/7 Customer Support

About news service from The fight for the control of our data will be expensive

Create a template that is visually captivating. It should not contain many images that can confuse someone. Construct solar light contextual text with people in your head. If you were the reader, what would arouse your interest posted on? Close to first lines of your email marketing newsletter, motivate the reader to read on by citing in the first lines what he or she can derive from your product or services. Using the essential. After constructing an impeccable letter, you can start sending your e-mail promoting newsletter. Here always be the best solutions to give away your products for free and build an email marketing list. An type of a free product is often a P.L.R., this stands for private Label The legal. These eBooks or guides should be able to be re-branded as they products include a distribution license with the idea to resell them or these away cost-free. To find a P.L.R. product just carry out search on google.

For most entrepreneurs building an email list is Asian. They do not understand the list building game, yet they want to be in the pro league and cash.The idea is that the coupon applies only for the next 5 minutes. You can get a countdown which shows the coupon slowly expiring. This can make it all modern urgent that your potential customer now does what have to have to do and makes all the purchase, which after every one of your ultimate goal with any sales throw.You probably have come across some directories that tell you free but you that there’s nothing like the reverse email lookup submission site. The so-called free directories are only using the planet free to get customers. To conduct pc hardware training via a reverse email lookup directory when looking out for who a real-world address belongs to, you will probably need to spend between $20-$25 per search.

About news service from The fight for the control of our data will be expensive

About news service from The fight for the control of our data will be expensive

The scandal with Facebook and Cambridge Analytica and the recent change of the data protection legislation (RGPD), have led to the awakening of our consciences in terms of privacy and control of our data.
It’s not something new, we’ve been hearing complaints about “ads that know what you’re looking for and that they’re after you”, problems in social networks because they do not have a criterion about which content to share (which in some cases has caused great damage) #Canadian Consumer Email List cases are numerous.
In my opinion, the root problem lies in ourselves. Internet has evolved at great speed and we have not had time to take the consequences. Everything is going so fast, and many times we are so comfortable, that we prefer to “click” before thinking about what we are doing.

Back Home


We tend to blame third parties: Facebook such, Google what, etc. And yes, it is possible that on more than one occasion they have crossed the line, but in the end the responsibility for our privacy on the Internet is ours.
We are the ones who decided to accept without reading the conditions of the service, those who prefer to connect with our Facebook account to a website, those who install applications and give them access permission for “everything”, etc. and those who share things in public without thinking about the consequences.

We need to be able to easily control what, with whom, how and when we share our data
I am totally in favor of an Internet use that allows us to have total control over the data we share. But this would be useless if we as users do not commit ourselves to be more responsible.
I think both scenarios are a matter of time.
As with many technology adoption processes, we are bumping up and down, going from one extreme to the other.

The fight for the privacy of our data will be expensive … to all
Why do I say that it will cost us all? Let me explain.
On the one hand, companies. According to a study carried out in December 2017 by Accenture in the United States, 44% of respondents (worldwide) felt frustrated when webs / online services were not able to offer a personalized service and on the other hand, 49% I was worried about the use of their data when subscribing to a website or services designed to offer them a personalized experience that anticipates their needs.

On the one hand, we want a personalized service, but on the other hand we are afraid to share our data because we do not know or we do not understand well what will happen with this information.

Problems partly caused by lack of transparency of these services and partly due to our ignorance.
It is estimated that the lack of personalization and confidence in the companies, generated a loss of 756 billion dollars (only in the United States) in 2017. Since these problems caused 41% of respondents to change company.
If we take into account that this study was carried out before the scandal of Cambrigde Analytica and the change of legislation of the RGPD, we can imagine the magnitude of the problem for companies today.